PROTECTOR PARTY

VOTE 1 John CASLEY B. Com. [Univ. of Melb.]

Policy 1

" To elect candidates who publicly and strongly support making *Excess Wealth Control
of citizens as illegal as is Excess Voting Control."

Free Enterprise differences in wealth supports both INCENTIVE and 'vive la difference', but extremes are unwise and Democracy is impossible with any excess power allowing excess control. No govt. not even Ancient Greece, has ever been fully democratic because no govt. over thousands of years, has ever put a cap on excess net worth, to prevent the excess power of oligarchs. But then it took thousands of years before the excess of slavery was made illegal.

It does seem strange does it not, that oligarchic net worth control, is still allowed by govt. to be legal when we are many and the oligarchs are few? WHY?? Perhaps: media, naivety, politician cringe, oligarchal determination - -? But it would seem fairly obvious for the many to see the present day extreme EFFECTS of this CONTROL:

[a] Social: firstly, an already existing absurdly unbalanced distribution of wealth for the meeting of material needs [housing, health, food, heat, child care and education, car, yacht, 'plane, entertainment etc.]; secondly, today's further unbalancing by the decreasing of our low, medium and high incomes; and thirdly, the inhuman increasing level of excess poverty and the ridiculous increasing of net worth excess e.g. multi-multi-multi-millionaires, billionaires and trillionaires.

[b] Political: firstly, the ability of oligarchs or wealth elites to fund all politicians and parties having no policies against excess net worths, into parliament and to reward them after they leave parliament with employment if they have served oligarchy well.
But secondly and more importantly, the oligarchs are getting more and more frightening CONTROL of an AI which is rapidly getting an ability to get more and more CONTROL of us via: surveillance, speech, language, information, shadow banning, digital ID and money, banking, migration-social division-war cruelty, child trafficking cruelty, drug cartels, injections, food, assassinations - - - - and even more horrifyingly, the predicted SOON control of our PERCEPTION - and hence our BEHAVIOUR - by direct access to our minds! No action time to waste!!

Control of Parliamentary representatives and AI must be in the hands 'of the **people'!!
SO, no more petty policies from Lib-Labs serving not you but 'the Big End of Town' [see Policy 2.].
Confidently and proudly vote for politicians who openly and often voice strong support for this policy - and vote weakest supporter last!

Some Features of this Excess Wealth Policy or True "New World Order":
1. Potential for Australia to be the FIRST Govt. to legally ban Excess Net Worth and be followed globally, like France was the first Govt. to [partially] ban slavery in 1315 and to be followed [very slowly] by other Govts.

2. Excess demand on our limited material resources stopped because of excess wealth not being
available to feed excess MATERIAL APPETITES e.g. a third private jet plane; weddings $50mill. to $1billion - - -

3. To have only legal wealth, citizens could unload their excess wealth ownership to friends,
family, shareholders, charities or our govt. Then with no wealth above the Excess threshold the
now non-oligarchic citizen still has INCENTIVE to work and contribute to our society with no concern for exceeding the excess threshold under the protection of PHILANTHROPY.

4. It gives pleasure to those citizens who love a govt. democracy not just 'of the people', but 'for the people' as in [a] **Social above, and 'by the people" as in [b] **Political above.

5. It gives pleasure to those citizens who want the requirements in 4. to be in an economy mix of capitalism - free enterprise - socialism and displeasure to those who want to be in an economy mix of fascism - cartels - oligarchy.

6. It gives pleasure to those who like the limitation put on the harm caused by psychopaths, SADISTS and narcissists wielding excess net worth power.

*Excess:
[a] defined as an amount that is too much to be desirable [love/obsession].
[b] decided democratically e.g. alcohol .05%; car speed 110km/h
[c] perhaps decided to be about $100 million
[d] seems no reason why the world would fail or collapse under excess law.

POLICY 2

"The power to CONTROL building heights in the suburbs of our citizens to be be
transferred to the Local Governments of those citizens".

POLICY 3

"Australia Post to become a competitive Public Bank servicing suburban branches."

POLICY 4

"The return of Victoria's status as a wonderful manufacturing State, again with sensible
protection, basically free of product arriving on foreign ships from foreign cartels
employing slave labour."

POLICY 5

"Non-cringing expulsion of representatives from governments guilty of genocide
or racism or war crimes or of assaulting innocent Australians."



protectorparty.com